🔗 Share this article

As dawn was breaking the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, representatives remained confined in a enclosed conference room, oblivious whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in difficult discussions, with dozens ministers representing 17 groups of countries ranging from the most vulnerable nations to the most developed economies.

Patience wore thin, the air thick as sweaty delegates confronted the sobering reality: there would not be a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The 30th UN climate conference hovered near the brink of total collapse.

The sticking point: Fossil fuels

Scientific evidence has shown for nearly a century, the CO2 emissions produced by utilizing fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to alarming levels.

Nevertheless, during more than three decades of regular climate meetings, the urgent need to cease fossil fuel use has been addressed only once – in a resolution made two years ago at the Dubai climate summit to "transition away from fossil fuels". Officials from the Middle Eastern nations, Russia, and several other countries were adamant this would not occur another time.

Mounting support for change

Simultaneously, a expanding group of countries were just as committed that movement on this issue was vitally needed. They had formulated a initiative that was gathering increasing support and made it clear they were ready to dig in.

Emerging economies desperately wanted to make progress on securing economic resources to help them cope with the growing impacts of climate disasters.

Breaking point

In the pre-dawn period of Saturday, some delegates were prepared to leave and trigger failure. "The situation was precarious for us," commented one national delegate. "I was prepared to walk away."

The critical development happened through talks with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, principal delegates separated from the main group to hold a confidential discussion with the lead Saudi negotiator. They urged text that would indirectly acknowledge the global commitment to "move beyond fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unexpected agreement

Rather than explicitly mentioning fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the previous commitment". Following reflection, the Saudi delegation surprisingly accepted the wording.

The room expressed relief. Celebrations began. The deal was finalized.

With what became known as the "Brazil agreement", the world took an incremental move towards the systematic reduction of fossil fuels – a faltering, inadequate step that will scarcely affect the climate's continued progression towards disaster. But nevertheless a significant departure from total inaction.

Major components of the agreement

• In addition to the subtle acknowledgment in the legally agreed text, countries will begin work a plan to phase out fossil fuels
• This will be largely a voluntary initiative led by Brazil that will report back next year
• Addressing the required reductions in greenhouse gas emissions to stay within the 1.5C limit was likewise deferred to next year
• Developing countries secured a tripling to $120bn of regular financial support to help them cope with the impacts of climate disasters
• This funding will not be delivered in full until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "just transition mechanism" to help people working in polluting businesses move toward the renewable industry

Mixed reactions

As the world approaches the brink of climate "irreversible changes" that could destroy ecosystems and force whole regions into chaos, the agreement was not the "significant advancement" needed.

"Cop30 gave us some baby steps in the right direction, but in light of the magnitude of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," stated one environmental analyst.

This limited deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the political challenges – including a American leader who shunned the talks and remains wedded to oil and coal, the rising tide of nationalist politics, continuing wars in different locations, extreme measures of inequality, and global economic uncertainty.

"The climate arsonists – the energy conglomerates – were at last in the spotlight at Cop30," notes one climate activist. "This represents progress on that. The political space is open. Now we must turn it into a real fire escape to a protected environment."

Deep fissures revealed

Although nations were able to celebrate the gavelling through of the deal, Cop30 also exposed deep fissures in the primary worldwide framework for tackling the climate crisis.

"UN negotiations are agreement-dependent, and in a time of global disagreements, agreement is progressively challenging to reach," observed one international diplomat. "We should not suggest that this summit has delivered everything that is needed. The gap between our current position and what science demands remains concerningly substantial."

If the world is to prevent the most severe impacts of climate breakdown, the international negotiations alone will fall far short.